tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9532013.post3565001635975356880..comments2024-03-28T04:12:44.103-04:00Comments on The Confrontation Blog: Reply brief in Clark Richard D. Friedmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08376534293308240526noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9532013.post-48074676957903884122015-02-10T08:47:24.435-05:002015-02-10T08:47:24.435-05:00In Duhs v. Capra, No. 13-CV-1056 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 3,...In Duhs v. Capra, No. 13-CV-1056 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2015), Judge Jack Weinstein held that a child's statement to an emergency room doctor that the defendant held him in a tub causing burns were testimonial and granted a writ of habeas corpus. In doing so, Judge Weinstein distiguished Ohio v. Clark, and held that the N.Y. Court of Appeals application of the Crawford rule was objectively unreasonable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com