The Confrontation Blog

This blog is devoted to reporting and commenting on developments related to Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Crawford transformed the doctrine of the Confrontation Clause, but it left many open questions that are, and will continue to be, the subject of a great deal of litigation and academic commentary.

Wednesday, July 03, 2019

›
Julien v. State , 2019 WL 2750591 , a decision issued yesterday by the Texas Court of Appeals, First District, shows how vulnerable the law...
9 comments:
Tuesday, May 28, 2019

White v. Louisiana: a cert petition to watch

›
White v. Louisiana , No. 18-8862, may provide the Supreme Court with an opportunity to begin clarifying and repairing the doctrine governing...
5 comments:
Saturday, April 27, 2019

A reminder that an excited utterance can be testimonial

›
People v. Allen , a decision handed down yesterday by a justice of the Supreme Court of New York (the trial court of general jurisdiction) f...
2 comments:
Friday, April 26, 2019

A belated assessment: People v. Sanchez

›
    I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. Sanchez , 63 Cal.4th 665, 374 P.3d 32...

Objecting to hearsay, and forgetting about the Confrontation Clause

›
Before Crawford , it was not surprising that defense counsel sometimes failed to make Confrontation Clause objections; it wasn't clear w...
11 comments:
Friday, February 15, 2019

A new and interesting case on the not-for-truth end run

›
Stu Dedopoulos, a blog reader who diligently keeps me informed, has told me about Orlando v. Nassau County District Attorney’s Office , an i...
2 comments:
Monday, November 19, 2018

First word from Justice Gorsuch on the Confrontation Clause

›
The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Stuart v. Alabama , No. 17-1676.  I believe there is good news and bad news here.  Stuart wa...
19 comments:
Tuesday, May 01, 2018

Continuing confusion on lab tests

›
Stu Dedopoulos, who does a wonderful job of keeping me informed, has brought to my attention the decision of the supreme court of his home s...
9 comments:
Friday, March 09, 2018

Autopsy reports -- still waiting for clarification

›
Last May, I posted a discussion concerning the treatment of autopsy reports under the Confrontation Clause.  The principal issue is when, or...
7 comments:
Friday, September 15, 2017

Another look at the Craig-Crawford disjuncture?

›
Crawford did not purport to disturb Maryland v. Craig , 497 U.S. 836 (1990) , which allowed a prosecutor in some circumstances to present t...
5 comments:

Scotusblog piece on the effects of Melendez-Diaz

›
Scotusblog recently ran a piece by Andrew Hamm titled Looking back at predictions in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts .  Here is a link.  I...
8 comments:
Tuesday, May 30, 2017

An issue to be resolved: The treatment of autopsy reports

›
This blog has remained dormant for some time, it part because I have been distracted by other work and in part because there haven't bee...
13 comments:
Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Third petition on surrogate experts

›
Tim Provis, counsel for the petitioner in Roalson v. Wisconsin , No. 15-6037, which presents an issue similar to Griep and Katso , has kind...
48 comments:
Thursday, November 26, 2015

New cert petitions on the "expert witness end-run"

›
At least two cert petitions are currently before the Supreme Court on the question of whether, or when, a prosecution may present the substa...
18 comments:
Monday, June 22, 2015

Audio of public radio show on Ohio v. Clark

›
Joan Meier, who commented last week on this blog, and I appeared on Friday on a Los Angeles public radio show, discussing Ohio v. Clark . If...
15 comments:
Friday, June 19, 2015

Ohio v. Clark: Some Initial Thoughts

›
A few thoughts on the decision in Ohio v. Clark : 1.  The result is totally unsurprising, and I was not even surprised by the unanimity a...
66 comments:
Thursday, June 18, 2015

Clerk reversed

›
The Supreme Court decided Ohio v. Clark today.  You can see the opinions here .  The result is a 9-0 reversal in favor of the State.  No pa...
21 comments:
Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Civil Confrontation

›
The Confrontation Clause, of course, only applies in favor of a criminal defendant.  But it has long appeared to me that it reflects a broad...
194 comments:
Saturday, March 28, 2015

Remote testimony

›
Here's a belated report on a recent development in a long-standing issue.  Last month, the Supreme Court denied certiorari  in New Mexic...
9 comments:
Friday, March 13, 2015

An Op Ed: How courts should hear from children

›
Today's Washington Post is publishing an Op Ed piece by Steve Ceci and me, How courts should hear from children .  It summarizes the vie...
10 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

Contributors

  • Richard D. Friedman
  • Richard D. Friedman
Powered by Blogger.