The Confrontation Blog

This blog is devoted to reporting and commenting on developments related to Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Crawford transformed the doctrine of the Confrontation Clause, but it left many open questions that are, and will continue to be, the subject of a great deal of litigation and academic commentary.

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

An encouraging cert denial in an autopsy case

›
It's always a mistake to read too much into a denial of certiorari, but I find encouraging the Supreme Court's denial this morning i...
2 comments:
Wednesday, February 09, 2022

The "why I acted the way I did" end-run

›
 Prosecutors often try to get in testimonial evidence from absent witnesses by arguing that it is not offered for the truth of what it asser...
4 comments:
Friday, January 21, 2022

Hemphill v. New York: the right call

›
  Apologies for being silent so long. The Supreme Court decided Hemphill v. New York this week.   The Court held that the Confrontation C...
2 comments:
Friday, July 02, 2021

Hemphill v. New York, pending Supreme Court case: Top-side briefs

›
It's been quite a while since I've posted anything on this blog, for no particular good reason.  I will try to pick up the pace. For...
6 comments:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020

A significant decision on remote testimony

›
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. Jemison , a case that I have mentioned in a prior post and in which ...
6 comments:
Thursday, June 04, 2020

The dying, blinking witness

›
Chris Miller, an excellent former student of mine, has pointed out Woods v. Cook , a recent Sixth Circuit opinion of interest by Judge Sutt...
5 comments:
Monday, May 04, 2020

Remote testimony and the coronavirus crisis

›
The coronavirus crisis has created increased interest in the subject of remote testimony – testimony in which the witness is not in the cou...
10 comments:
Wednesday, September 04, 2019

Laird Kirkpatrick on forensic reports

›
I previously posted an entry about Stuart v. Alabama and Justice Gorsuch's dissent from the denial of certiorari in that case.  Laird ...
67 comments:
Wednesday, August 28, 2019

BIO and reply in support of petition in White v. Louisiana

›
I previously blogged about White v. Louisiana , in which a cert petition is pending.  You can find the documents here .  They now include t...
25 comments:
Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Important DC Circuit opinion on unavailability

›
Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion, in U.S. v. Burden , that may be important in determining unavai...
12 comments:
Wednesday, July 03, 2019

›
Julien v. State , 2019 WL 2750591 , a decision issued yesterday by the Texas Court of Appeals, First District, shows how vulnerable the law...
9 comments:
Tuesday, May 28, 2019

White v. Louisiana: a cert petition to watch

›
White v. Louisiana , No. 18-8862, may provide the Supreme Court with an opportunity to begin clarifying and repairing the doctrine governing...
5 comments:
Saturday, April 27, 2019

A reminder that an excited utterance can be testimonial

›
People v. Allen , a decision handed down yesterday by a justice of the Supreme Court of New York (the trial court of general jurisdiction) f...
2 comments:
Friday, April 26, 2019

A belated assessment: People v. Sanchez

›
    I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. Sanchez , 63 Cal.4th 665, 374 P.3d 32...

Objecting to hearsay, and forgetting about the Confrontation Clause

›
Before Crawford , it was not surprising that defense counsel sometimes failed to make Confrontation Clause objections; it wasn't clear w...
11 comments:
Friday, February 15, 2019

A new and interesting case on the not-for-truth end run

›
Stu Dedopoulos, a blog reader who diligently keeps me informed, has told me about Orlando v. Nassau County District Attorney’s Office , an i...
2 comments:
Monday, November 19, 2018

First word from Justice Gorsuch on the Confrontation Clause

›
The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Stuart v. Alabama , No. 17-1676.  I believe there is good news and bad news here.  Stuart wa...
19 comments:
Tuesday, May 01, 2018

Continuing confusion on lab tests

›
Stu Dedopoulos, who does a wonderful job of keeping me informed, has brought to my attention the decision of the supreme court of his home s...
9 comments:
Friday, March 09, 2018

Autopsy reports -- still waiting for clarification

›
Last May, I posted a discussion concerning the treatment of autopsy reports under the Confrontation Clause.  The principal issue is when, or...
7 comments:
Friday, September 15, 2017

Another look at the Craig-Crawford disjuncture?

›
Crawford did not purport to disturb Maryland v. Craig , 497 U.S. 836 (1990) , which allowed a prosecutor in some circumstances to present t...
5 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

Contributors

  • Richard D. Friedman
  • Richard D. Friedman
Powered by Blogger.