This blog is devoted to reporting and commenting on developments related to Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Crawford transformed the doctrine of the Confrontation Clause, but it left many open questions that are, and will continue to be, the subject of a great deal of litigation and academic commentary.
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
Bryant Transcript
The Supreme Court held argument today in Michigan v. Bryant. You can read the transcriupt by clicking here. I will post some comments on the argument, tonight or tomorrow.
2 comments:
paul
said...
It appears as though Breyer, Alito & Kennedy are questioning the validity of Crawford's testimonial approach.
Breyer, in particular, seems to question whether history supports Crawford. He seems to want to limit the scope of the CC to, what he calls, the "Raleigh situation" -- statements obtained by government coercion for purpose of prosecution.
Alito, Roberts & Kennedy, to the extent they will adhere to Crawford and Davis, appear inclined to define the term "ongoing emergency" broadly to encompass the situation in Bryant.
I see a 5 (Breyer, Alito, Kennedy, Roberts & Thomas)-3 (Scalia, Ginsburg & Sotomayor) opinion reversing the Michigan Supreme Court.
It will be interesting to see what Breyer, Alito & Kennedy state regarding the purpose & scope of the CC. And whether any of their opinions undermine the Crawford approach.
*untuk deposit pulsa kami menerima provider -XL -Telkomsel
untuk bonus yang kami miliki kami memiliki *bonus cashback 0,5% *bunus refferal 20% *bonus gebiar bulanan (N-max,samsung Note 10+,Iphone xr 64G,camera go pro 7hero,Apple airpods 2 ,dan freechips)
Daftar Langsung Di:
SENTANAPOKER
Kontak Kami;
WA : +855 9647 76509 Line : SentanaPoker Wechat : SentanaPokerLivechat Sentanapoker
Proses deposit dan withdraw tercepat bisa anda rasakan jika bermain di Sentanapoker. So… ? tunggu apa lagi ? Mari bergabung dengan kami. Pelayanan CS yang ramah dan Proffesional dan pastinya sangat aman juga bisa anda dapatkan di Sentanapoker.
2 comments:
It appears as though Breyer, Alito & Kennedy are questioning the validity of Crawford's testimonial approach.
Breyer, in particular, seems to question whether history supports Crawford. He seems to want to limit the scope of the CC to, what he calls, the "Raleigh situation" -- statements obtained by government coercion for purpose of prosecution.
Alito, Roberts & Kennedy, to the extent they will adhere to Crawford and Davis, appear inclined to define the term "ongoing emergency" broadly to encompass the situation in Bryant.
I see a 5 (Breyer, Alito, Kennedy, Roberts & Thomas)-3 (Scalia, Ginsburg & Sotomayor) opinion reversing the Michigan Supreme Court.
It will be interesting to see what Breyer, Alito & Kennedy state regarding the purpose & scope of the CC. And whether any of their opinions undermine the Crawford approach.
Haloo pak^^
Kami dari SENTANAPOKER ingin menawarkan pak^^
Untuk saat ini kami menerima Deposit Melalui Pulsa ya pak.
*untuk minimal deposit 10ribu
*untuk minimal Withdraw 25ribu
*untuk deposit pulsa kami menerima provider
-XL
-Telkomsel
untuk bonus yang kami miliki kami memiliki
*bonus cashback 0,5%
*bunus refferal 20%
*bonus gebiar bulanan (N-max,samsung Note 10+,Iphone xr 64G,camera go pro 7hero,Apple airpods 2 ,dan freechips)
Daftar Langsung Di:
SENTANAPOKER
Kontak Kami;
WA : +855 9647 76509
Line : SentanaPoker
Wechat : SentanaPokerLivechat Sentanapoker
Proses deposit dan withdraw tercepat bisa anda rasakan jika bermain di Sentanapoker. So… ? tunggu apa lagi ? Mari bergabung dengan kami. Pelayanan CS yang ramah dan Proffesional dan pastinya sangat aman juga bisa anda dapatkan di Sentanapoker.
Post a Comment